Pearl River Delta Law

Home » Conference papers » New article: ‘Private labels and products liability: hypermarkets as apparent producers’

New article: ‘Private labels and products liability: hypermarkets as apparent producers’

Juridical Review

My article ‘Private labels and products liability: hypermarkets as apparent producers’ has just been published in the ‘Juridical Review’ – the Law Journal of the Scottish Universities (part 3, 2013, pp. 469-481). I had the pleasure of presenting this same text at the “Who then in Law is my neighbour? International Law Conference: Donoghue v Stevenson 80 years on”, held at the University of the West of Scotland (Paisley), on 25 May 2012.

Here is the abstract: Modern-day supermarkets and hypermarkets have been introducing new market strategies that aim to simplify the traditional production and distribution system. Among these novelties is the surprising conversion of retailers into producers through the use of their own brands (‘private labels’). The retailer assumes full control over the production and distribution of private label products. He is responsible for the product’s quality and conformity, a role that was traditionally reserved to producers. Council Directive 85/374/EEC, of 25 July 1985 adopted an economic concept of ‘producer’ that includes ‘any person who, by putting his name, trade mark or other distinguishing feature on the product presents himself as its producer’ (the so-called ‘apparent producer’). On this day and age, the brand is a channel of information between supply and demand, exercising a communicative function that can be viewed as a position of liability that its holder assumes for products that he puts into circulation. By labelling products with his own brand, the retailer assumes the same risk as real producers. The trade mark holder shall be liable for the damage caused by defective products jointly and severally with the product’s real manufacturer. The inclusion of the trademark owner in the concept of producer is closely linked to consumers’ expectations. Consumers see the trade mark on the product and are reasonably confident that the holder of such mark had some control over the production and will, accordingly, be liable for any damage caused by the product. In this article we analyse the connection between product liability and consumer expectations, determining whether the consumer may directly sue the hypermarket if the product is defective and causes damages.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: